We ran a story in our 7:55/8:05 newscasts fed to affiliates this morning that used the word “fag” as a reference to homosexuals. We also used the story in our 8:30 capsule that some of our stations run instead of one of the longer newscasts.
Sometimes the use of disparaging words or phrases is a ticklish thing for reporters to address. Do we use it so our readers or listeners understand precisely what someone said? Or do we use a safer phrase such as “n-word”? Or do we even go beyond saying “slur for homosexuals” or “racial slur?”
Here’s how we decided to use the word “fag” in our story this morning:
In our morning review of about 20 Missouri newspapers online, we came across a story that a member of the Missouri Southern State University (Joplin) Board of Governor had resigned after using a homosexual slur at last Saturday’s board meeting. We went to the Joplin Globe’s website to read the original article about the resignation and saw that the Globe reported board member David Ansley commented on the athletic department’s new logo, “We went from the f– lion to the ferocious lion.”
Print media stories can do that. But some readers might want to know exactly what was said and broadcasters have trouble dealing with an “f” and then two blanks. How do we say that?
The story noted that the Globe’s reporter last weekend had been twittering during the meeting and had written the exact quote. So we went to the Globe’s Twitter page and found the exact quote. Because the spoken word in news reporting is perceived differently from the spoken word in written reporting, we decided to use the word that was spoken at the meeting.
We are aware that opinion can be divided on the use of such a word in courteous speech as well as in reporting news. But when someone quickly resigns after blurting out such a word and says in his resignation statement that he always thought of himself as tolerant until realizing to his own dismay that he must deal with his own prejudices, the issue easily reaches the level where we felt it appropriate to use the word he used so listeners would understand why a man who had been regarded by board contemporaries as a “good” and “valued” governor.
Reporters sometimes in reporting the news have to decide whether their reporting of the insensitive remarks of others makes them appear insensitive too. Sometimes it is more insensitive not to be specific. Somebody has to make that editorial decision, often in a matter of seconds when writing the story. We are not saying those in the print media were wrong in how they addressed the word in their stories. It just made more sense to us to write the story the way we did.
The fact that this guy has to resign over this is insane. The fact that your organization is worried about using that word on the radio is rediculous as well. We need to get over ourselves. This political correctness has got to stop.
The word should’nt have been uttered in the first place by the fore mentioned person but if you have to use dashes to cover up your speech then you’re probably politically correct. if you want to report it as said then you just face whatever criticism you might recieve and go on. The politically correct will move on to someone else to hassle…
Political Correctness is the downfall of modern media as well as the country as a whole.
The fact that the media and the people of this country will actually stand by while blacks and gays will use these slurs and that is considered okay but anyone else it is such an agreggious error. If it is so wrong then no one should say it.
Feigning offense and people resigning over using slang is dumb plain and simple.
Using politically correct terms is a way of showing respect to someone. If you think it’s ok to use the word “fag” to refer to someone or something, then you clearly have no respect for that person. Give respect, get respect.
Newspapers tend to be niggardly, I appreciate the Missourinet’s approach to news reporting for the sake of clarity. That’s why I listen!