We’re feeling left out

Several of our Capitol Press Corps colleagues got an amazing and amazingly stupid offer a few days ago, apparently based on the idea that unlimited money can buy unlimited things—state laws, the people who write them, parts of the state constitution.

Reporters.

A public relations company hired by Rex Sinquefield’s Grow Missouri organization has sent letters to several political reporters offering to pay them $250  per article to write two or three articles a month favorable to Sinquefield’s causes for the Grow Missouri blog.  At least one of the offers said the authorship of the articles could be kept secret because there would not be a byline.

“Hi, Alex,” says the cheery salutation from Molly Berry of Skyword to Capitol Press Corps colleague Alex Stuckey, “I would love to discuss a potential writing opportunity with you.  I came across several of your articles in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch website and I really like your work…Based on your writing style and level of expertise, I think you would be a great fit.”

“Hi Jason,” says the equally cheery salutation from Molly Berry to colleague Jason Rosenbaum.  “I would love to discuss a potential writing opportunity with you.  I came across several of your articles on the St. Louis Public Radio and St. Louis Beacon websites and I really like your work…Based on your writing style and level of expertise, I think you would be a great fit.”

The Columbia Daily Tribune’s Rudi Keller, who sits next to me at the Senate press table, got one of the emails.  “I came across several of your articles on the Columbia Tribune website and I really like your work,” she wrote.   He says the paper’s city editor, Matt Sanders, also got one of the letters.

Rudi is a tremendous detail guy in his reporting.  He started digging and wrote in the Tribune that Skyword  “describes itself on its website as a company that creates advertising that resembles news articles or lifestyle features intended to sell a product or political idea.”

Clearly this is an organization with high ethical standards.

Rudi was told by Skyword’s CEO that the solicitations were a “mistake.”  And a spokeswoman for Grow Missouri claimed to be ignorant of Berry’s solicitation.

Grow Missouri is the Sinquefield-financed group that spend a huge wad of money last year on advertising to pressure state lawmakers to overturn a Nixon veto of a tax cut bill Sinquefield wanted.  When that $1.3 million dollar effort didn’t work, Grow Missouri used more than $600,000 additional Sinquefield financial fuel to try to defeat four Republican Representatives who didn’t do Sinquefield’s bidding last year.  All four, however, won their primaries after letting constituents know of the effort by outsiders to defeat them.

Well, golly Miss Molly, we feel rather badly because you apparently think we are not worthy of solicitation.   After all, we are going to be retiring soon and will start living on a fixed income and, well, you know—–

Or do you think our principles are so much higher than Alex’s or Jason’s or Rudi’s or Matt’s that we’re not a candidate for  creating advocacy that “resembles news articles?”  Be careful how you answer that because you might be insulting these colleagues of mine if you say “yes.”   Oh, wait, I think you’ve already done that.

Don’t try to make it up to me now. It’s too late.  I don’t forget a snub.

Besides, I’ll fire anybody in my shop who accepts your kind offer.

DIY executions

Let’s throw some gasoline on the fire in the debate about executions and the drugs used to accomplish them.

The Associated Press filed a report from Brussels, Belgium the other day about a convicted murderer and rapist who says he cannot control his sexual urges and therefore can never be released from prison.  He has been granted the right to euthanize himself.  He had asked the courts to transfer him to a special psychiatric center where he could be treated or to be allowed to order his own execution.  The courts in Belgium have said “no” to the move to the psychiatric center but have said “yes” to his right to order his own death.

Frank Van Den Bleeken has been given permission to have himself moved to a hospital where doctors will hook him up to the killing chemical(s) and on his orders send him on his way.

Belgium has allowed mercy killings since 2002 for those with incurable psychological or physical conditions .  The AP report says about 1,400 people a year take that option.  But this is the first time it’s been allowed for a prisoner. The country otherwise does not have capital punishment.

Assisted suicide has been batted around in our courts and in our legislative halls for years and the most famous advocate for it and practitioner of it, Dr. Jack Kevorkian,  has spent some time in prison in this country. But the story from Brussels adds a new flavor to that issue as well as to the issue of capital punishment.

Euthanasia is illegal in every state.  But  PAD is legal in New Mexico, Oregon, Vermont, Washington, and Montana.  Physician Aid in Dying differs from euthanasia because PAD requires the patient to decide when and where to administer the final dose.  Euthanasia has the doctor do it.

It would take a law change in Missouri to let inmates have this option and there will be scads of organizations challenging any such law in the courts.

In recent post-execution comments by some family members of murder victims, the comment has been made that forcing them to wait for two decades for justice to be done constitutes cruel and unusual punishment for them.

Would Missouri ever allow a condemned inmate who knows he or she will never leave prison alive anyway to have this option—someone who has through the spiritual growth many of these inmates say they have experienced while under the death sentence and who has accepted their fate and perhaps even looks forward to it as a step into a new form of freedom?

Should the right to die be allowed for those facing state-sanctioned death anyway?

Many inmates’ last statements include apologies to the victims’ families..   Would any of these inmates have the courage to bring relief to their victims’ families by pushing their own execution button?

No last-minute stays.  No last-minute court filings.  No backing out because an executioner will push the button if the inmate chickens out.

Frank Van Den Bleeken is adding a new dimension to the issue.

The graceful departure II

The clock read something like 4:00 a.m. in Room 102 of the Super 8 Motel in Bonne Terre last Wednesday morning when this reporter finished sending stories of the Ringo execution back to the network for use in morning newscasts.  It read shortly after 8:00 a.m. when I clawed my way out of sleep to pack and leave for Jefferson City where the legislature was gathering to consider whether it could override dozens of Governor Nixon’s vetoes of things they had done in the session that ended in mid-May.

A drive made somewhat  more hazardous by sometimes heavy rains on curving roads brought me to the Capitol at 12:30, before the Senate had started the serious work of overrides.  I had predicted I would miss little if anything because I expected Senator Maria Chappelle-Nadal would be exclaiming at length about the inadequacies of Governor Nixon’s response to the recent incidents in Ferguson.  And indeed, she was.   And later, when word reached the Capitol that protestors were confronting police trying to keep them from blocking part of Interstate 70, there was a short reprise.

The veto session in the senate ground on and on, lengthened by her extensive discourse about Fergon and then lengthened more by minority Democrats talking against passage of the 72-hour waiting period for women wanting abortions, and extended to its final moments when Democrats seized the floor and let it be known no more bills would be allowed to come up for consideration because majority Republicans had moved the previous question on the abortion bill, immediately stopping the Democrat filibuster-in-development and forcing a vote on the issue.

The PQ, as it is called in legislative slang, is seldom used in the Senate.  It was last used in 2007, in fact.  It’s considered an insult by those who are gagged by its use in a chamber that regularly emphasizes equality among its members and respect for the rights of all Senators to debate an issue as they wish.

So the session ended in the Senate on an acrimonious note sometime after 1 a.m.  It was more than an hour later, with the House still in session, that this reporter headed to the newsroom to write veto session stories and record the morning newscasts.  The morning newscasts were a terrible struggle, poorly done, before I asked Sports Director Bill Pollock to wake me up after about half an hour on the full-length couch the company finally installed after 25 years in this building (and numerous all-nighters for elections, blizzards, and other events).  The remaining newscasts were better-done before the reporter finally made it home with, I am sure, divine intervention.  Somebody was steering that car and I’m not sure it was entirely the driver, operating on four and a half hours of sleep since 4:30 Tuesday morning.

One of the things I carried into the house was a framed resolution from the Missouri Senate, signed by all of its members.  At some point during that long, long 53-hour span, the Senate stopped what it was doing so Senator Mike Kehoe could bring up the resolution observing that this reporter will be retiring December 1.  It was filled with kind observations and best wishes and was adopted with a standing ovation.

I sat in my usual place at the press table enduring the reading—c’mon now, you’ve probably been in situations where people or a group lavish attention on you and it’s probably been kind of uncomfortable—and as the Senate applauded, I stood, nodded, murmured “Thank You,” and sat back down.  Senator Kehoe came over to present the framed resolution. The Senator photographer took a picture.  Kehoe has a big smile.  I appear uncertain about all of this.

Maybe it was fatigue layered on top of the discomfort about being fawned over.  But it would be easy for those who signed the resolution and applauded its presentation to think the recipient was ungrateful.

Well, I’m not.  The resolution was a nice, gracious, thing for Senator Kehoe and his colleagues to do and I appreciate it a great deal.

Most of us, I suspect, deal with compliments awkwardly at best.  Receiving a competitive award is one thing.  Having someone tell you, in effect, that what you’ve done with your life amounts to something—well, that’s a little harder because it’s boastful to say, in effect, “Heck yes it has!”

And it certainly is improper for the awardee to say, “I don’t really deserve this,” which insults the giver.  It is not up to awardees to determine their worthiness. It is instead a compliment paid by the givers and should be accepted as such.

So if you see the picture, don’t let it fool you.  The resolution was appreciated very much because, in truth, all of us want someone to assure us that we haven’t wasted our time on this earth.  Perhaps if more of us spent more time telling each other that, because most of us deserve to hear it, we’d know better how to accept a compliment as gracefully as it is given.

At the end of the week I was left pondering an honor from those who had sung my praises only about eighteen hours after I had watched the departure of one who left “unwept, unhonored , and unsung.”

And I have promised I will practice being more gracious.